Sponsored Links


Random Topics - Super Mario Bros.

Super Mario Bros. is a platform video game developed by Nintendo in late 1985 and published for the Nintendo Entertainment System as a sequel to the 1983 game Mario Bros. In Super Mario Bros., the titular character, Mario, saves Princess Toadstool (later renamed Princess Peach) of the Mushroom Kingdom from King Koopa (later renamed Bowser), king of the Koopas. Mario's younger brother, Luigi, is playable by the second player in the game's multiplayer mode, and assumes the same plot role as Mario. To save Princess Toadstool, Mario conquers the eight worlds of the Mushroom Kingdom by going to the castle in each to defeat a minion of King Koopa. To reach each castle, Mario battles through three "sub-worlds" by defeating or avoiding King Koopa's henchmen. If Mario successfully fights his way through the castle and defeats the minion, a Mushroom Retainer (later renamed Toad) is freed. Inside the eighth castle, Mario has a final fight with King Koopa and free Princess Toadstool.

Wikipedia Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Mario_Bros.
eBay Link: View Super Mario Bros. on eBay

Boned When... (Login to Submit a Reason)

1 Never Boned Still rocks.
Please Login to Vote
2 No more after SMB3 Nintendo moved on to lame projects
Please Login to Vote
3 Super Mario Sunshine Did they just run out of ideas?
Please Login to Vote
4 Mario Party too many sequels, none of them fun
Please Login to Vote
5 Day 1 Sucked from the start.
Please Login to Vote
6 Merging with Sega Games with Sonic and Mario? Really?
Please Login to Vote
7 Mario is Missing/Time Machine Worst Mario games ever
Please Login to Vote

Super Mario Bros. Comments (You must Login to Comment)

1 Is Mario even a relevant character in this generation of gaming? I mean, all he has going for him is rehashes of Super Mario Bros, Mario Karts and Mario Party. Mario used to be like white hot from late 80s throughout 90s and early '00s. Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars, Super Mario World, Super Mario 64 etc. But it seems he's in a weird typecast kind of position with his games. -- Submitted By: (Infyrin) on January 29, 2015, 6:19 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
2 may be my very first video game character i ever know. never finish an original first one though, always stuck at world 7. but even at that time i have a hack and finish it eventually. i even get to extra-bug stage.looking back at that time, the game was way hard then current day. the game these day mostly(not all) support player too much sometime. those maker fear no player can finish it aren't thay? -- Submitted By: (caim) on May 24, 2012, 1:34 am - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
3 It seems that those who voted that it "boned" have not played the recent Super Mario games like Super Mario Galaxy and Galaxy 2, games that are well-received. The series is still going strong. -- Submitted By: () on January 10, 2012, 7:14 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
4 Those, along with Hotel Mario for the cd-i, were the only bad Mario games, IIRC. -- Submitted By: (Robert) on March 14, 2011, 6:25 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
5 I could say that there no such thing as a bad mario game unless it's a bootleg game until I played those two worst games: Mario's Time Machine and Mario is Missing. There's is a good reason why you mix education games with Mario. They have crappy graphics, the controls sucks and gameplay is too confusing. I couldn't even get past the first level because it's so fustrating. I don't blame Nintendo for denying their existence but these two games are the boning point of Mario. -- Submitted By: (SSM) on March 8, 2011, 6:40 pm - (-1 votes) - Login to Vote
6 The best video game series ever, but Mario Party was the bone moment. I hated that game series. -- Submitted By: (Mr.Zimpy) on January 2, 2011, 7:19 pm - (-1 votes) - Login to Vote
7 Marcus, I would assume that Super Mario World is part of the series. I think since then it has been hard to tell what is part of the series since there is so much change to it. That is why I think the franchise should just be retired. As far as the pipe to Democrat's faces, I can forgive that. You are entitled to your opinion as am I. -- Submitted By: (MCS) on January 10, 2010, 5:52 pm - (-1 votes) - Login to Vote
8 MCS, Super Mario Land takes place after Super Mario Bros. So does that make Super Mario Land part of the series? Also, please forgive me for my "lead pipe to Democrats" facet. I also posted it partially out of anger, and I now regret it. -- Submitted By: (Marcus) on January 10, 2010, 11:13 am - (-1 votes) - Login to Vote
9 Marcus, what difference does it make if Super Mario World is called Super Mario 4 or not? If you read the little story in the booklet it states that it takes place after Super Mario 3. Regardless of that, I think the series just kind of fizzled out after Super Mario World. They came up with all of these ridiculous games with Mario as a baby and Paper Mario, and all of those to where Mario is like a caricature for Nintendo. I think that realistically he was an 80s icon that should probably just be retired. -- Submitted By: (MCS) on January 9, 2010, 1:27 pm - (-1 votes) - Login to Vote
10 No one recognizes Super Mario World as Super Mario Bros. 4 anymore, and it doesn't deserve that title either. If Super Mario Bros. 4 is actually Super Mario World, Smokey Robinson is actually a British singer. -- Submitted By: (Marcus) on December 26, 2009, 10:10 am - (-1 votes) - Login to Vote
11 Super Mario Bros 4 is actually Super Mario World. And it's one of the greatest games ever made. If there was a good moment when SMB Boned the Fish, it would be Super Mario Sunshine. But it immediately jumped back with New Super Mario Bros. and Super Mario Galaxy. And New SMB Wii ain't too shabby either (yes there is less originality, but it still a terrific game). -- Submitted By: (btf52) on November 25, 2009, 8:10 am - (-1 votes) - Login to Vote
12 I know, but calling them an "idiot" is going a little too far, wouldn't you agree? -- Submitted By: (ScottyB) on August 2, 2009, 1:41 pm - (-1 votes) - Login to Vote
13 I'd buy SMB4! -- Submitted By: (Robert) on August 2, 2009, 11:12 am - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
14 Actually, in this case it does. After Nintendo came out with SMB3, they failed to restore the magical charm of SMB3 to future games. What we need is a resurrection of the NES and a Super Mario Bros. 4. If an SMB4 should be made, it should have what I suggested in my first comment here, plus the same power-ups and more. Remember in SMB3 we had Small, Super, Raccoon, Fire, Tanooki, Frog, and Hammer Mario/Luigi? SMB4 should have all of that, plus things like Boomerang, Sledgehammer, Cannonball, and Bullet power-ups. Sounds interesting, huh? -- Submitted By: (Marcus) on August 2, 2009, 9:35 am - (-1 votes) - Login to Vote
15 Dude, Marcus, calm down. Just because somebody disagrees with you doesn't make them an idiot. -- Submitted By: (ScottyB) on July 31, 2009, 7:54 am - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
16 Of course the Super Mario Bros. series (1, 2, and 3) never boned. However, the most recent games Mario and Luigi have starred in suck ass! Therefore, whoever thinks they never boned the fish is an idiot. -- Submitted By: (Marcus) on June 9, 2009, 11:04 am - (-1 votes) - Login to Vote
17 Why no more in the Super Mario Bros. series after Super Mario Bros. 3? Nintendo came out with Super Mario World, Yoshi's Island, and Super Mario 64. But why no Super Mario Bros. 4? Hey, I have an idea. Why not Super Mario Bros. 4 be Mario and Luigi fighting terrorists around the Earth and defeating and capturing Osama bin Laden. It would be a great game, and a great launch title for the revival of the NES. When should it happen? A future decade, perhaps? -- Submitted By: (Marcus) on May 4, 2009, 9:57 pm - (-1 votes) - Login to Vote

Login to See the QUICK COMMENT Box


Log in to BTF

Register - Forgot password?

Follow on Twitter!

App on Facebook


Related eBay Auctions

Powered By: TempusMedia - (Page load took:0.613 seconds)