Sponsored Links

 

Movie Series - Shrek

Shrek is a CGI movie series produced by Dreamworks Animation. It stars Mike Myers as Shrek the ogre, Eddie Murphy as Donkey, and Cameron Diaz as Princess Fiona. Shrek was released in 2001. Shrek 2, which was released in 2004, introduced Fiona's parents, King Harold and Queen Lillian. In Shrek the Third, which was released in 2007, Shrek and Fiona are to become king and queen after King Harold falls ill and subsequently passes away, but they instead search for a suitable heir to the throne. The fourth movie, Shrek Goes Fourth, is planned for release in 2010.

Wikipedia Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shrek
eBay Link: View Shrek on eBay

Boned When... (Login to Submit a Reason)

#ReasonWhy?VotesVote
1 Shrek the Third Number three is the nail in the coffin
69
Please Login to Vote
2 Part II A little goes a loooong way
19
Please Login to Vote
3 Day 1 Sucked from the start.
7
Please Login to Vote
4 The Broadway Show Bad costumes, awful songs.
5
Please Login to Vote
5 Never Boned Still rocks.
1
Please Login to Vote
6 Donkey calls Gingy "cracker" What's with the racial slur?
1
Please Login to Vote

Shrek Comments (You must Login to Comment)

#Comments
1 I hated the third one and it really boned but somehow Unboned itself with the fourth movie, which I loved. It's my favorite of them all. -- Submitted By: (JericaLily) on May 21, 2013, 6:18 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
2 Shrek 3 is where it boned. The first and even second one were good but that's where the gravy train should have stopped. -- Submitted By: (Icemouth) on November 30, 2012, 7:30 am - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
3 SPOILER ALERTS if you haven't seen the Fourth movie! Also, sorry for the long post ahead. IMHO, the fourth movie wasn't bad, but it's loaded with plot holes (which, in turn, make you realize the previous sequels have them as well). When the movie starts, it's revealed that when Shrek rescued Fiona, he stopped the King and Queen from signing a deal with Rumpelstiltskin. But in the second movie, Prince Charming goes the castle, and finds Fiona was already rescued. Since Shrek 4 takes place in an alternate universe where Shrek was never born, what happened to the Fairy Godmother (who'd still be alive if Shrek never existed) and Prince Charming? They're nowhere, not even as a cameo or flashback (except during the credit roll, to reflect on the previous three movies). In the second movie, the Fairy Godmother made a deal with the King that her son would marry Fiona. So why are the King and Queen making a deal with Rumpelstiltskin instead of her? And since she'd still be alive, where is she to fight Rumpelstiltskin over who rules Far Far Away? With Shrek gone, the King and Queen surrender their kingdom to Rumpel, then disappear out of existence. Rumpel doesn't uphold his deal to free Fiona. Since Shrek doesn't exist, Prince Charming (or Lord Farquaad) could've saved her instead. In the alternate universe, Dragon has been moved to Rumpel's castle. Was she taken there before or after Fiona left the castle? If before, rescuing Fiona would've been easy. In fact, instead of hiring someone in the first movie (which was Shrek, but now Shrek was never born), Farquaad could've saved her himself. Like Fairy Godmother and Prince Charming, Farquaad is never seen, much less mentioned. Back to Fiona, she gets tired of waiting and...frees herself. She stayed there to hide her curse. Now that she's free, and the curse is broken by true love's kiss, she can find her true love. According to the second movie, she had a crush on Prince Charming, so she should've looked for him. Instead, she joins the ogres, as their warrior queen. She was ashamed to be an ogre until she met Shrek, so why would she be with ogres instead of people? Then, we have Puss in Boots. Introduced in the second movie as a hitman hired by the King to kill Shrek, he's become Fiona's overweight pet. He would never have met Fiona if not for Shrek. It would've been apropos if he was a freelance hitman against the ogre forces (bonus points would've been awarded if he saw the error of his ways and joins them, like he did in Shrek 2). But if he's Fiona's pet, wouldn't it be more logical that he were a warrior like her? OK, I admit, fat Puss is funny, but there's no way Shrek never existing would turn him into Garfield. In the first movie, the fairy tale characters were in Shrek's swamp because Farquaad was hunting them down, and Shrek made a deal to get rid of them. If Shrek never existed, they'd still be using the swamp as a secret hiding place (no Shrek = no one kicks them out). Donkey was originally going to be sold in the first movie, but he runs away and Shrek saves him. So it makes sense that he's the witches' slave. What happens to all the other characters, like Arthur, and the others from the third movie? Surely they would have helped in the fight against Rumpel. -- Submitted By: (Robert) on March 2, 2012, 1:02 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
4 I really liked the first two films, although the 3rd and 4th were both 'meh' to me. I will give Dreamworks credit, though, on the fact that they were intending on making a 5th film (one in the regular Shrek canon, not the Puss in Boots movie), but stopped production and decided to make the 4th film the last (again, not countng the Puss in Boots film). -- Submitted By: (cartooner) on November 7, 2011, 2:30 am - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
5 It just doesn't end. Now there's a 5th movie in the works, a prequel about Puss in Boots. -- Submitted By: (Robert) on August 16, 2011, 12:07 pm - (1 votes) - Login to Vote
6 First Shrek movie was brilliant, second one not quite as great but pretty good. Shrek the Third...at best, meh. Haven't seen the fourth one, but the smart money says it was one last attempt at whoring the franchise for another few bucks. -- Submitted By: (BigAl) on November 7, 2010, 8:20 am - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
7 The first Shrek was brilliant and something different, the second one was good as well but not to the extent of the first. However Shrek the Third was bad and brought little new to the table, it sullied the charm of the first two but not to an excruciatingly bad extent. I will not be seeing the fourth actively and hopefully it will be the last. -- Submitted By: (johnnydough) on June 30, 2010, 1:45 am - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
8 Ugh. Shrek has been slaw-tered. -- Submitted By: (Robert) on April 15, 2010, 7:25 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
9 If you think Shrek hasn't boned, check out this officially licensed fashion spread: http://www.vman.com/fashion/shrek-of-a-guy/ -- Submitted By: (Travoltron) on April 15, 2010, 12:32 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
10 Until they find the need to whore it off for a few more bucks -- Submitted By: (PYLrulz) on April 14, 2010, 3:17 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
11 Three things you need to know about the 4th film: 1. It's called "Shrek Forever After" 2. Plot summary-basically "It's a Wonderful Life," but with the Shrek characters 3. It's the FINAL film in the series (praise the Lord!) -- Submitted By: (Burmy) on April 13, 2010, 9:58 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
12 exactly if their is a fifth i am pickiting the studio -- Submitted By: (NanaOsakifan200) on January 13, 2010, 4:38 pm - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
13 In the perfect world, they would see that after the 3rd Shrek, another one would be unnecessary. Unfortunately, this is not a perfect world -_- -- Submitted By: (PYLrulz) on December 4, 2009, 7:00 am - (0 votes) - Login to Vote
14 The first movie was very good. The second was good. The third was the boning moment. So, why are they planning a fourth movie? Oh right, they want the money. -- Submitted By: (Robert) on May 15, 2009, 11:28 am - (0 votes) - Login to Vote

Login to See the QUICK COMMENT Box

BONETHEFISH

Log in to BTF


Register - Forgot password?


Follow on Twitter!

App on Facebook

www.bonethefish.com

Related eBay Auctions

Powered By: TempusMedia - (Page load took:0.406 seconds)